# Devin vs Claude Code: which autonomous coding agent wins in 2026?

**Source:** https://promtable.com/compare/devin-vs-claude-code

> Devin wins on fully autonomous async PR generation and async session UI. Claude Code wins on terminal-native dev integration, plan mode, and per-call pricing. Pick Devin for queued tickets, Claude Code for in-flow dev work.

---
Devin wins on fully autonomous async PR generation and async session UI. Claude Code wins on terminal-native dev integration, plan mode, and per-call pricing. Pick Devin for queued tickets, Claude Code for in-flow dev work.

## At a glance

| Dimension | Devin | Claude Code |
|---|---|---|
| Autonomy level | Fully autonomous (queue ticket → PR) | Plan-first interactive + headless agent mode |
| Interface | Web app, async sessions | **Terminal + IDE + plan UI** ✓ |
| Setup | Connect repo, give task, wait | CLI install, ANTHROPIC key |
| SWE-bench performance | Strong (Cognition's stated bench) | Strong on real-world code tasks |
| Pricing | $500/mo team tier and up | **Pro / Max sub or API per-token** ✓ |
| Tool use | Sandbox + browser + shell built-in | **MCP servers + bash + file edits + browser** ✓ |
| Multi-step planning | Yes (autonomous) | Yes (plan mode + agent loops) |
| Approval workflow | End-of-task review | **Step-by-step approval (plan mode)** ✓ |
| Best for | Async ticket triage, queued small fixes | Interactive dev, plan-first refactors, terminal-native |

## Verdict

Devin is the right pick for teams that want to queue tickets and review PRs days later — fully autonomous workflow, fits well for backlog burn-down. Claude Code is the right pick for in-flow dev work where the engineer is at the keyboard: plan mode, step approval, terminal-native, broad MCP integration, lower per-task cost. Many teams use both — Claude Code for interactive work, Devin / background agents for queued tickets.

## When to pick which

- **Devin** — Queued tickets, async PRs, hands-off backlog burn-down.
- **Claude Code** — In-flow dev, plan-first refactors, terminal-native, MCP integration, cheaper per task.

## FAQ

### Devin or Claude Code for backlog burn-down?

Devin — built for queueing tickets and async PR generation.

### Devin or Claude Code for in-flow dev?

Claude Code — terminal-native plan mode is faster for the engineer at the keyboard.

### Cheaper?

Claude Code — per-token API or Pro/Max sub, vs Devin's flat team tier.

## Related

- [/compare/cursor-vs-claude-code](https://promtable.com/compare/cursor-vs-claude-code)
- [/compare/github-copilot-vs-cursor](https://promtable.com/compare/github-copilot-vs-cursor)
- [/alternatives/devin](https://promtable.com/alternatives/devin)
- [/glossary/autonomous-coder](https://promtable.com/glossary/autonomous-coder)

*Last updated: 2026-06-01*
---

Original page: https://promtable.com/compare/devin-vs-claude-code
Maintained by Promtable (https://promtable.com). Content: CC BY 4.0. Cite as "Promtable — https://promtable.com/compare/devin-vs-claude-code".
Contact: info@vibecodingturkey.com.